Paraureteric space post-ureteric re-implantation: a rare cause of small bowel obstruction
- 1 Princess Royal University Hospital, Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- 2 Urology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Correspondence to Martina Spazzapan; martina.spazzapan@nhs.net
Abstract
A female patient in her 80s presented with a 2-day history of abdominal pain and absolute constipation, having previously undergone a robotic left distal ureterectomy with ureteric re-implantation. CT revealed a closed-loop small bowel obstruction with transition point adjacent to the left ureter and resultant upstream hydronephrosis. An emergency laparotomy revealed small bowel herniation into a paraureteric space created by her previous surgery and defined by the distal ureter medially, the common iliac vessels laterally and the mobilised bladder dome anteriorly. The viable small bowel was reduced, and the space was eliminated by omental flap transposition after omentoplasty. The patient made a full recovery. Preoperative diagnosis of such an unusual cause of internal herniation can be challenging. This very rarely reported case raises awareness of the condition and proposes a treatment strategy.
Background
An internal hernia (IH) is a protrusion of abdominal viscera through a peritoneal or mesenteric aperture into a compartment of the abdominal or pelvic cavity. The incidence of IHs is less than 1%; however, they cause 0.6%–5.8% of all small bowel obstructions.1 IHs can be acquired—for example, postsurgical, inflammatory or congenital—for example, paraduodenal or pericaecal. The incidence of postsurgical IHs is rising owing to increased numbers of transmesenteric, transmesocoloic and retroanastomotic surgical procedures.2 Nevertheless, pelvic IHs are extremely rare, and only a handful of cases of paraureteric small bowel obstruction have been reported.3–11 We report on an female patient in her 80s who presented with paraureteric small bowel obstruction 2 years after a robotic left distal ureterectomy and left ureteric re-implantation for a transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and distal ureter.
Case presentation
A female patient in her 80s presented with a 2-day history of acute colicky central abdominal pain. She had associated absolute constipation and vomiting. On examination, she was dehydrated but haemodynamically stable, with a soft, moderately distended abdomen and mild tenderness in the periumbilical region. There were no signs of peritonism. On digital rectal examination, the rectum was empty.
Her medical history included hypertension, Graves’ disease (hypothyroid state) and high-grade transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder and ureter. Additionally, she had been diagnosed with syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone with chronic hyponatraemia, migraines, atrial fibrillation (not anticoagulated), middle and posterior pelvic compartment prolapse, and mixed incontinence. She was on prophylactic antibiotics for recurrent urinary tract infections and intermittently self-catheterised. Her regular medications included amlodipine, atorvastatin, ramipril and levothyroxine, and she had no known drug allergies. She had been first diagnosed with a G2pT1 bladder TCC 17 years before and was treated with a transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). She subsequently had multiple recurrences within the bladder treated with a combination of repeat TURBTs, intravesical mitomycin and BCG. Four years prior to the current admission, she had been diagnosed with recurrence at the left distal ureter (G3pTa) and a year later, she underwent a robotic left distal ureterectomy with left ureteric re-implantation. At the time of the case presentation, she was in remission under surveillance with regular cystoscopies that showed inflammation and bladder mucosal ulceration only. She was independent of her activities of daily living and her WHO Performance Status was 1.
Investigations
Considering her history and presentation, a diagnosis of small bowel obstruction was entertained. Immediate resuscitation was initiated with intravenous fluids, nasogastric tube decompression and bowel rest. Analgesia, antiemetics and broad-spectrum antibiotics were administered, and appropriate investigations were organised. Her full blood count, biochemistry (renal and liver function tests, C reactive protein) and venous lactate were at her baseline (table 1).
Admission blood tests
Haemoglobin (g/L) | 126 |
White cell count (×109/L) | 7.9 |
Lymphocytes (×109/L) | 0.7 |
Neutrophils (×109/L) | 7 |
Platelets (×109/L) | 233 |
C reactive protein (mg/L) | <1 |
Lactate (mmol/L) | 0.6 |
Bilirubin (µmol/L) | 15 |
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) | 88 |
Alanine transaminase (IU/L) | 13 |
Amylase (U/L) | 68 |
Creatinine (µmol/L) | 43 |
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | >90 |
Sodium (mmol/L) | 128 |
Potassium (mmol/L) | 4.6 |
Coronavirus RNA | Negative |
-
eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
CT of the abdomen and pelvis was reported in keeping with early closed-loop small bowel obstruction. There was dilated distal small bowel with faecalisation, and a transition point was located in the left side of the pelvis lateral to the urinary bladder. There was the impression of soft tissue encasing the left ureter, with resultant significant upstream left hydroureteronephrosis (figure 1).
CT of the abdomen and pelvis: coronal section demonstrating hydroureter and a dilated and faecalised small bowel.
Differential diagnosis
Differential diagnoses for this patient’s closed-loop small bowel obstruction included postoperative adhesional obstruction, local recurrence of TCC at bladder or ureter, peritoneal or omental disease, congenital band and abdominal wall herniation.
Treatment
Emergency multidisciplinary team discussion was undertaken, involving general surgery, urology, anaesthetics, intensive care and radiology specialists. Since the patient had normal renal function tests and the ureteric distention was likely chronic post re-implantation, a left ureteric decompression by ureteric stent was not deemed necessary. The possibility of TCC recurrence was entertained, but it was acknowledged that the patient would not have been suitable for radical redo ureteric or bladder resection. Therefore, the treatment options were exhausted in addressing the bowel obstruction only, irrespective of aetiology. The above was discussed with the patient and her family, and the relevant risks and benefits were detailed.
An emergency laparotomy was undertaken through the midline, under combination of general and spinal anaesthesia. The main finding was an internal herniation of the ileum just proximal to ileocaecal junction into the iatrogenic space formed by the previous ureteric re-implantation and bladder closure. This was defined by the distal ureter medially, the common iliac vessels laterally and the mobilised bladder dome anteriorly (figure 2). The herniated section of the small bowel was constricted (figure 3); this was reduced with gentle traction and after thorough inspection it was found to be viable, so no resection was required. In order to prevent recurrence of bowel herniation through the same fixed space, an omentoplasty was performed; omentum was mobilised off its attachment on the transverse colon and was transposed as a vascularised pedicle to ‘plug’ the paraureteric space. It was then fixed in place with non-absorbable 2-0 polypropylene sutures to the pelvic side wall and along its length on the parietal peritoneum of the lateral abdominal wall (figure 4). Peritoneal fluid was aspirated and sent for cytological analysis that proved to be normal, with no evidence of recurrence of neoplasia.
Intraoperative picture demonstrating the location of the paraureteric space in the left pelvis where the small bowel was herniated. Illustration drawn by Martina Spazzapan.
Intraoperative picture demonstrating the circumferential constriction of the herniated section of small bowel.
Intraoperative picture demonstrating the sutured omental plug in the paraureteric space. Illustration drawn by Martina Spazzapan.
Outcome and follow-up
The patient had had an uneventful recovery on the ward, and after stepwise escalation of her diet, she returned to normal bowel habit. She was discharged home 1 week later without any complications. A follow-up CT was performed 6 weeks after the operation, which revealed normal bowel anatomy. Upon outpatient review, the patient reported a return to baseline with no ongoing gastrointestinal symptoms. She will continue to undertake bladder surveillance with the urology team.
Discussion
Common causes of small bowel obstruction include adhesions, Crohn’s disease, neoplasia and hernias. In patients with previous pelvic or abdominal surgery, adhesional obstruction is considered high in the differential. In those with oncological background, malignant obstruction needs to be considered too. Internal hernias are less common and are often only diagnosed intraoperatively unless cross-sectional imaging suggests the diagnosis.1
The incidence of paraureteric internal hernia has not been documented but it is extremely rare. To our knowledge, only 10 cases of paraureteric small bowel herniation and obstruction have been reported (table 2), none of which have been associated with ureteric cancer or robotic operations.
Published case reports on paraureteric small bowel obstruction
Author | Surgical background | Interval between operation and obstruction | Intraoperative diagnosis | Ureter divided | Bowel resection | Ureter repair | Treatment of defect |
Hay3 | Abdominal hysterectomy for fibroids+ureteric re-implantation on the fundus | 20 years | Yes | Yes | No | Psoas hitch | No |
Hocken and Kapff9 | Wertheim’s hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma | 4 years | Yes | Yes | Yes | Primary repair | No |
Hussain et al 4 | Ureteric re-implantation for vesicoureteral reflux | 17 years | Yes | Yes | Yes | Primary repair | No |
Takagi et al 8 | Radical hysterectomy and radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma | 2 years | Yes | Yes | Yes | Boari flap | No |
Flores et al 5 | Resection of endometriotic lesion in distal ureter and transperitoneal re-implantation with psoas hitch | 2 years | No (CT diagnosis) | No | Yes | Not applicable | Parietalisation of ureter to pelvic wall |
Cole-Clark et al 6 | Radical cystectomy and ileal conduit | 12 days | Yes | No | No | Not applicable | Omental packing |
Cho et al 7 | Ureteric stricture repair followed by hysterectomy (unspecified) | 25 years; 6 years | Yes | No | No | Not applicable | No |
Anderson et al 15 | Intra-abdominal renal transplant (redo) for congenital obstructive uropathy | 3 years | Yes | Yes (intentional) | Yes | Revision ureterocystostomy (occluded ureter) | No |
Tovmassian et al 10 | Intra-abdominal renal transplant; previous simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant | 22 years; 5 years | Yes | Yes | Yes | Repeat laparotomy; Boari flap | No |
Gupta et al 11 | Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant | 5 years | Yes | Yes | Yes | Primary repair | No |
Review of the above limited available evidence suggests that the interval between the index operation and the emergence of small bowel obstruction ranged widely between 12 days and over 20 years. This indicates that internal herniation could be a primary or delayed complication, some of which may happen many years postoperatively.
Additionally, in 6 of the 10 reports (table 2), the ureter had been misinterpreted for an adhesional band and was inadvertently transected, thus requiring reconstruction that prolonged surgery and incurred in significant patient morbidity. In our case, the involved ureter was grossly dilated and easily recognisable, but we recommend that surgeons have a high index of suspicion; nevertheless, it is important to confirm the anatomy prior to division of any presumed adhesions and consider that what appears as an adhesion band may be an intraperitoneal ureter. A preoperatively inserted ureteric stent, if feasible, might aid to this direction.
Interestingly, only one case was diagnosed preoperatively based on imaging alone, with the other 10 reports (and our case) getting to the diagnosis intraoperatively. We therefore recommend that clinicians consider the potential diagnosis of paraureteric hernia in this patient group and seek advice by specialist radiologists with experience in postoperative urological anatomy, in order to confidently plan surgical treatment.
With regard to the management of the paraureteric space, only two cases report a specific approach to the defect—with one case indicating parietalisation of the ureter to pelvic wall, and another using omental packing. In our case, the hernia neck was defined by the ureter, iliac vessels and bladder wall, so closure of the defect with sutures would have been impossible without damaging these structures. Instead, we decided to proceed with omentoplasty and omental plugging to eliminate the space and limit the risk of further herniation in the future.
Omentoplasty is a technique commonly employed to provide a perfused flap in iatrogenic voids within the abdomen, such as treatment of liver hydatid cysts, reinforcement of the rectovaginal septum after treatment of rectovaginal fistulas and closure of gaps after abdominoperineal resections.12–14 Therefore, its use was felt appropriate in this rare circumstance.
It is not always clear if this paraureteric space is generated as a primary event and exists immediately after ureteric reconstruction, or if it becomes more accentuated after tissue repair and intra-abdominal scar contraction. If such a space is immediately noted during the index procedure, there may be a place for primary prophylactic ‘plugging’ with omentum, similar to the concept of closing a mesenteric defect after a bowel resection to prevent transmesenteric herniation. Certainly, this simple method proved effective in eliminating the space after reduction of small bowel and preventing from internal hernia recurrence in our case; therefore, we strongly recommend its use.
Learning points
-
Consider internal herniation of small bowel into the paraureteric space in patients with previous ureteric surgery presenting with small bowel obstruction.
-
Involve the multidisciplinary team including urology if there is suspicion of an intraperitoneal ureter and have good knowledge of previous imaging and operation notes.
-
Have a high index of suspicion in approaching adhesiolysis. Consider the possibility that what appears as an adhesion band may in fact be an intraperitoneal ureter.
-
Avoid dividing any adhesions in the setting of re-implanted ureter until anatomy is clearly defined.
-
Consider omentoplasty and plugging of the paraureteric space either prophylactically during index ureteric re-implantation operation or during repair of the hernia to eliminate the space and prevent recurrence.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
-
Contributors MS and RB contributed equally to this paper and are to be considered joint first authors. They both provided substantial contributions to the conception of the work and drafted the paper. NMN provided senior urological input at the time of patient presentation as well as during write-up of the case. EY was the consultant in charge of the patient and provided senior surgical supervision throughout the work.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer